It is a truth universally acknowledged that an innovation project worthy of the name will be unpredictable even at the best of times; add producing and storing hydrogen in a wastewater treatment facility, a first for us at Anglian Water, and the project suddenly becomes in equal measure exciting and challenging.
The opportunities for learning, however, are plenty. Here are some key insights gathered along the way, around supplier engagement strategies, Health and Safety (H&S) best practice and onboarding of technical specialists.
Triple carbon reduction: three areas of insight
- Supply chain engagement and procurement process
When procuring an electrolyser, size does, in fact, matter. Most suppliers in the hydrogen space tend follow current market demand and therefore cater to bigger capacity (at least over 1MW), driving up the economy of scale. We only ever planned to operate a smaller demonstration plant, due to the limited oxygen demand for the size of MABR, and engagement proved to be challenging: many suppliers, while interested in the innovative nature of the project, could not commit to a partnership or enter a tender due to their business developing in a different direction.
Once a supplier is secured, it is advisable to build some lag into the programme. The hydrogen industry is booming with demand, components lead times are often up to years, and technical experts are a hot commodity, potentially leading to delays and high turnover in the project team.
- Health and Safety requirements
Unlike more common flammable gases such as biogas, hydrogen has distinct characteristics that require special handling and safety measures, above and beyond common water sector practices and procedures. Hydrogen is the lightest element, and it diffuses rapidly, which can lead to leaks if not properly managed. Additionally, hydrogen has a wide flammability range and low ignition energy, making it more prone to combustion.
Understanding these properties is crucial for a safe and effective design and construction process, which will need to undergo comprehensive safety reviews to avoid or mitigate risk for personnel and site assets. Whilst most of these are standard practice in our sector, such as HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) and DSEAR (Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations) assessment, some additional reviews and studies, such as blast modelling, or bow-tie analysis, will need to be carried out.
They say lightning never strikes twice, but when installing a hydrogen producing facility for the first time, even unlikely events need to be planned for, to build a safe and effective response system in case of emergency. For this reason, engaging with hydrogen H&S professionals early in the project can ensure that all safety measures (i.e. lightning protection, setback distances) are planned and implemented effectively, helping to manage risks and ensuring compliance with safety standards during design, construction and operation.
- Lagging Technical Resources
However, the rapid pace of development in the hydrogen sector often outstrips the availability of technical resources.
Due to the lack of specialist skills and hydrogen expertise in-house, a number of safety reviews for TCR had to be commissioned to independent third parties to assure that all standards had been met, increasing delays for procurement and resourcing, and adding costs to the project.
Investing in training and development programs for technical staff can help bridge this gap. Additionally, collaborating with academic institutions and industry experts can provide access to the latest knowledge and technologies.
In conclusion: seize the opportunities and expect the unexpected (including hypothetical rodents)
In conclusion, hydrogen projects hold immense potential for the water sector and could significantly help reach our Net Zero goals.
By prioritizing safety, building a skilled workforce, fostering collaboration, and planning ahead, new hydrogen initiatives can successfully navigate the challenges and seize budding opportunities. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that no innovation project is entirely predictable; timescales (and consequently, costs) will slip more often than not, and there will always be at least one surprise in store.
Strictly hypothetically, some chilly rats could take refuge in the site office and force the team to dip into the contingency fund to relocate for a few weeks. We take it in stride, it makes for some good stories along the road!
—
Find out more about the Triple Carbon Reduction project on the Anglian website.